Profile of a blind white woman holding a cane

To determine the prevalence of access barriers in websites and mobile apps, participants were shown a list of tasks that people commonly perform using websites, mobile apps, or both. For each of the tasks they performed within the past year using a website, they were asked how often they encountered accessibility issues while performing the task with the option to select from the following responses: “Never,” “Less than half the time,” and “At least half the time.” Responses were coded as “Occasional barriers” if the participant reported having accessibility issues less than half the time, and “Frequent barriers” if the participant reported having accessibility issues more than half the time. Participants answered the same set of questions for tasks they performed within the past year when using mobile apps.

The tasks presented to the participants were organized in the following seven types of activities—commerce, employment, information, transportation, healthcare, education, and miscellaneous tasks. The following sections will report the prevalence of access barriers in websites and mobile apps while performing specific tasks in these categories of activities as reported by survey participants. The top nine tasks that presented the most common barriers for both website and app users will then be identified.




“The worst part of many mobile apps is that it’s often just one small feature that stops the entire process of using them. A button to place an order or select a quantity for example.” - Study Participant

A majority of participants reported using websites and apps for shopping, including meal and grocery delivery, as well as banking and finance. Some participants also used websites and apps for selling goods or services, scheduling personal services, or online dating. A small number also reported using websites(20 participants) and mobile apps (23 participants) to manage cryptocurrency.

Of the 317 participants who shopped on websites, 184 (58%) reported occasional access barriers and 89 (28.1%) reported frequent barriers. Among the 255 who shopped using mobile apps, 125 (55.6%) reported occasional barriers and 53 (23.6%) reported frequent barriers. Online dating also presented particularly common access barriers; for example, although only 49 participants reported using a dating app, nearly half (24, 49%) of those participants reported frequent access barriers. Table 3 lists the number of participants who reported using websites or mobile apps to perform each task, and among those users, the percentages who reported no barriers, occasional barriers, and frequent barriers.

Table 3: Prevalence of Access Barriers to Commerce-Related Tasks

Task User No Barriers Occasional Barriers Frequent Barriers
Website Users
Online shopping 317 44 (13.9%) 184 (58%) 89 (28.1%)
Banking/Finance 257 57 (22.2%) 156 (60.7%) 44 (17.1%)
Ordering food 214 26 (12.1%) 141 (65.9%) 47 (22%)
Scheduling personal services 110 33 (30%) 52 (47.3%) 52 (47.3%)
Online selling 91 19 (20.9%) 46 (50.5%) 26 (28.6%)
Online dating 63 11 (17.5%) 27 (42.9%) 25 (39.7%)
Cryptocurrency 20 8 (40%) 7 (35%) 5 (25%)
App Users
Online shopping 225 47 (20.9%) 125 (55.6%) 53 (23.6%)
Banking/Finance 215 66 (30.7%) 129 (60%) 20 (9.3%)
Ordering food 209 28 (13.4%) 126 (60.3%) 55 (26.3%)
Scheduling personal services 84 26 (31%) 38 (45.2%) 20 (23.8%)
Online selling 65 17 (26.2%) 34 (52.3%) 14 (21.5%)
Online dating 49 10 (20.4%) 15 (30.6%) 24 (49%)
Cryptocurrency 23 6 (26.1%) 12 (52.2%) 5 (21.7%)



Among the 200 participants who reported using a website to look for job opportunities, 106 (53%) reported occasional barriers and 66 (33%) reported frequent barriers. Among the 193 who reported applying for jobs on websites, 101 (52.3%) reported occasional barriers and 72 (37.3%) reported frequent barriers. Although the use of mobile apps for job searching was less common, with 85 participants using mobile apps to look for jobs and 64 to apply for jobs, both tasks were reported by app users to have similar prevalence of access barriers. Table 4 lists the number of participants who reported using websites or mobile apps to perform each task, and among those users, the percentages who reported no barriers, occasional barriers, and frequent barriers for each task.



Table 4: Prevalence of Access Barriers to Employment-Related Tasks

Task User No Barriers Occasional Barriers Frequent Barriers
Website Users
Looking for jobs 200 28 (14%) 106 (53%) 66 (33%)
Applying for jobs 193 20 (10.4%) 101 (52.3%) 72 (37.3%)
App Users
Looking for jobs 85 19 (22.4%) 42 (49.4%) 24 (28.2%)
Applying for jobs 64 13 (20.34%) 29 (45.3%) 22 (34.4%)



“Overall, the lack of accessibility of online services hinders my ability to access information in a timely, self-sufficient manner, and often requires me to spend extensive time seeking out alternative methods for accessing the same information as my sighted and hearing peers.” - Study Participant

Websites and mobile apps play a critical role in ensuring access to information. Most participants reported using websites or mobile apps to follow the news. Although a small number of participants reported frequent barriers with following the news, occasional barriers were reported by 125 (51.2%) of the 244 participants who follow the news on websites and 126 (53.4%) of those who do so on mobile apps. The same is true for participants who rely on websites for emergency alerts in which the reports of frequent barriers are small but reports of occasional barriers are higher. Of the 163 website users, 78 (47.9%) reported occasional barriers as did 62 (38.3%) of mobile app users. One hundred eighty-four participants reported using websites to learn about public benefits (such as SSI or SNAP benefits) with 53 (28.8%) reporting frequent barriers. Of the 70 who access the same information through mobile apps, 18 (25.7%) reported frequent barriers. Of the 168 who access information about housing listings on websites, 45 (26.8%) reported frequent barriers and of the 68 who access them on mobile apps, 15 (22.1%) reported frequent barriers. Table 5 lists the number of participants who reported using websites or mobile apps to access information, and among those users, the percentages who reported no barriers, occasional barriers, and frequent barriers to access each type of information.

Table 5: Prevalence of Access Barriers to Obtaining Information by Type

Task User No Barriers Occasional Barriers Frequent Barriers
Website User
News 244 82 (33.6%) 125 (51.2%) 37 (15.2%)
Benefits info 184 46 (25%) 85 (46.2%) 53 (28.8%)
Housing info 168 34 (20.2%) 89 (53%) 45 (26.8%)
Emergency alerts 163 57 (35%) 78 (47.9%) 28 (17.2%)
App User
News 236 83 (35.2%) 126 (53.4%) 27 (11.4%)
Benefits info 70 15 (21.4%) 37 (52.9%) 18 (25.7%)
Housing info 68 20 (29.4%) 33 (48.5%) 15 (22.1%)
Emergency alerts 162 76 (46.9% 62 (38.3%) 24 (14.8%)



One hundred and eighty-five participants used a website to book air travel in the last year, and 125 used a website to book interstate bus or train travel. Mobile app usage was less common for these activities, but was much more common for scheduling rideshare, with 209 participants using a rideshare app in the last year. One hundred fifty-nine participants reported using a website and 149 used a mobile app to look up local transit information, such as bus schedules. Websites and apps for booking air, bus, or train travel and local transit information presented relatively frequent access issues, while rideshare apps were rated as relatively accessible. Table 6 lists the number of participants who reported using websites or mobile apps to perform transportation related Tasks, and among those users, the percentages who reported no barriers, occasional barriers, and frequent barriers.

Table 6: Prevalence of Access Barriers to Transportation-Related Tasks

Task User No Barriers Occasional Barriers Frequent Barriers
Website User
Booking air travel 185 11 (5.9%) 107 (57.7%) 67 (36.2%)
Looking up local transit info 159 31 (19.5%) 80 (50.3%) 48 (30.2%)
Booking bus/train travel 125 11 (8.8%) 65 (52%) 49 (39.2%)
Scheduling rideshare 114 41 (36%) 56 (49.1%) 17 (14.9%)
App User
Booking air travel 117 17 (14.5%) 58 (49.6%) 42 (35.9%)
Looking up local transit info 149 39 (26.2%) 76 (51%) 34 (22.8%)
Booking bus/train travel 88 11 (12.5%) 50 (56.8%) 27 (30.7%)
Scheduling rideshare 209 76 (36.4%) 117 (56%) 16 (7.7%)



“I missed critical health information because Captcha barriers prevented me from accessing my doctor’s health portal.”- Study Participant

Many participants reported using websites or apps to manage their health. For example, 255 participants reported using a website to review their medical records or test results, or to access healthcare service information like finding a doctor. Similarly, 128 participants used a mobile app to look for healthcare service information. One hundred ninety-eight participants used a website to schedule healthcare appointments and 129 used a mobile app, while 185 used a website to receive services and 141 used a mobile app. Smaller numbers of participants used websites or apps for wellness management (such as meditation and fitness) or mental health services. Across the healthcare tasks, about 40%-50% of participants reported occasional barriers while 20%-30% reported frequent barriers. Table 7 lists the number of participants who reported using websites or mobile apps to perform healthcare-related tasks, and among those users, the percentages who reported no barriers, occasional barriers, and frequent barriers when performing those tasks.

Table 7: Prevalence of Access Barriers to Healthcare-Related Tasks

Task User No Barriers Occasional Barriers Frequent Barriers
Website User
Obtaining healthcare info 254 63 (24.8%) 130 (51.2%) 61 (24%)
Reviewing medical records 255 71 (27.8%) 124 (48.6%) 60 (23.5%)
Scheduling appointments 198 51 (25.8%) 93 (47%) 54 (27.3%)
Receiving telehealth services 185 28 (20.9%) 68 (50.7%) 38 (28.4%)
Managing wellness 28 (20.9%) 68 (50.7%) 38 (28.4%)
Accessing mental health info 113 35 (31%) 46 (40.7%) 32 (28.3%)
App User
Obtaining healthcare info 128 42 (32.8%) 59 (46.1%) 27 (21.1%)
Reviewing medical records 159 60 (37.7%) 66 (41.5%) 33 (20.8%)
Scheduling appointments 129 46 (35.7%) 53 (41.1%) 30 (23.3%)
Receiving telehealth services 141 39 (27.7%) 67 (47.5%) 35 (24.8%)
Managing wellness 113 30 (26.5%) 51 (45.1%) 32 (28.3%)
Accessing mental health info 56 15 (26.8%) 25 (44.6%) 16 (28.6%)



One hundred thirty-seven participants reported using a website to access college or university coursework within the last year, with eighty-one (59.1%) reporting occasional barriers and 39 (28.5%) reporting frequent barriers. Of the 69 who accessed college or university coursework on mobile apps, 32 (46.4%) reported occasional barriers and 26 (37.7%) reported frequent barriers. Some participants also reported using websites or apps for other types of adult learning, such as language learning or Data Camp. Sixty-six participants reported using a website to access information from a child’s school, while 39 reported using an app. Twenty-six (39.4%) reported frequent barriers when accessing a child’s school information on the web and 12 (30.8%) reported frequent barriers when doing so with a mobile app. Table 8 lists the number of participants who reported using websites or mobile apps to perform tasks related to education, and among those users, the percentages who reported no barriers, occasional barriers, and frequent barriers when performing those tasks.

Table 8: Prevalence of Barriers to Education-related Tasks

Task User No Barriers Occasional Barriers Frequent Barriers
Website User
Taking college courses 137 17 (12.4%) 81 (59.1%) 39 (28.5%)
Self-learning 99 22 (22.2%) 52 (52.5%) 25 (25.3%)
Accessing information in child’s school 66 10 (15.2%) 30 (45.5%) 26 (39.4%)
App User
Taking college courses 69 11 (15.9%) 32 (46.4%) 26 (37.7%)
Self-learning 90 22 (24.4%) 52 (57.8%) 16 (17.8%)
Accessing information in child’s school 39 5 (12.8%) 22 (56.4%) 12 (30.8%)

Miscellaneous Tasks


Participants were asked about five additional tasks: email or instant messaging, social media, use of digital maps, games, and photography or art. Most participants used websites or apps for email and instant messaging with few access barriers. Most participants also used websites or mobile apps for social media and digital maps. One in four participants (25%) reported frequent access barriers using mobile apps for maps, while 42% reported frequent barriers with map-related websites. Table 9 lists the number of participants who reported using websites or mobile apps to perform each of the five tasks, and among those users, the percentages who reported no barriers, occasional barriers, and frequent barriers when performing these tasks.

Table 9: Prevalence of Barriers to Miscellaneous Tasks

Task User No Barriers Occasional Barriers Frequent Barriers
Website user
Email/IM 280 116 (41.4%) 138 (49.3%) 26 (9.3%)
Social media 254 50 (19.7%) 141 (55.5%) 63 (24.8%)
Digital maps 152 25 (16.4%) 63 (41.4%) 64 (42.1%)
Games 123 39 (31.7%) 49 (39.8%) 35 (28.5%)
Photo/design/art 52 11 (21.2%) 21 (40.4%) 20 (38.5%)
App Users
Email/IM 272 121 (44.5%) 131 (48.2%) 20 (7.4%)
Social media 237 52 (21.9%) 137 (57.8%) 48 (20.3%)
Digital maps 188 43 (22.9%) 98 (52.1%) 47 (25%)
Games 156 52 (33.3%) 61 (39.1%) 43 (27.6%)
Photo/design/art 64 19 (29.7%) 29 (45.3%) 16 (25%)


Tasks with the Most Prevalent Barriers


After gathering the responses of all the survey participants, all the tasks were rank ordered by the percentage of website and app users who reported experiencing any barriers (either occasional or frequent barriers). The top ten tasks with the most frequent barriers for websites and for mobile apps, separately, were identified and the list was narrowed down to nine tasks that appear in the top ten on both lists. The list below represent the percentage of website and app users who expressed that they face either occasional or frequent barriers with each of the top nine tasks.

  1. Booking train or bus travel: 91% of website users, 87% of app users
  2. Booking air travel: 94% of website users, 85% of app users
  3. Ordering food: 88% of website users, 87% of app users
  4. Applying for jobs: 90% of website users, 80% of app users
  5. Doing college coursework: 88% of website users, 84% of app users
  6. Accessing information from a child’s school: 85% of website users, 87% of app users
  7. Shopping online: 86% of website users, 79% of app users
  8. Locating job opportunities: 86% of website users, 78% of app users
  9. Online dating: 82% of website users, 80% of app users


Overall Barrier Frequency


Finally, participants were asked, overall, how often they typically encounter any kind of accessibility issue while using websites and again while using mobile apps. In response, 21% of participants reported facing accessibility barriers with websites at least once daily and 28% reported access barriers with mobile apps at least once a day. Approximately 20% of website and app users reported facing barriers at least once a week but not every day; 30% of website users and 23% of app users reported facing barriers at least once a month but not every week. Only about 25% of participants reported encountering access barriers with websites or mobile apps less than once a month. Table 10 lists the overall barrier frequency experienced by participants when using websites and apps.

Table 10: Barrier Frequency in Websites and Apps

Frequency Websites Apps
At least once a day 74 (21.1%) 85 (28.2%)
Nearly every day 31 (8.9%) 31 (10.3%)
3-5 times a week 21 (6%) 20 (6.6%)
1-2 times a week 21 (6%) 22 (7.3%)
3-4 times a month 61 (17.4%) 43 (14.3%)
1-2 times a month 48 (13.7%) 28 (9.3%)
Less than once a month 94 (26.9%) 72 (23.9%)


Strategies for Coping with Barriers


Participants were asked to report which strategies they use when they encounter accessibility issues with a website or mobile app. They were provided a list of options and were allowed to check as many strategies as they wished. A total of 355 participants responded to this question regarding their experience with websites, while 304 participants responded regarding mobile apps. One hundred fifty-five participants (43.7%) indicated they have done business elsewhere if they encountered an inaccessible website while seeking goods or services, while 125 participants (41.3%) reported doing business elsewhere when they encounter an inaccessible mobile app. For websites, other common strategies included switching browsers, getting in-person help from a sighted person, and trying the mobile version of the website. Using residual vision to access the site was the least common strategy used, with 53 people referencing it. Other less commonly selected strategies included trying a different screen reader mode, selected by 106 participants, and using a visual interpreting service, selected by 111 participants. For access barriers in mobile apps, nearly 196 participants tried updating the app or switching to a web version. Many also sought in-person help from a sighted person. Table 11 lists some of the coping strategies used by both web and app users.

Table 11: Coping Strategies

Website Strategies Survey Respondents
Switching to another browser 228 (64.2%)
Getting in-person help from a sighted person 213 (60%)
Switching to a mobile version 197 (55.5%)
Switching to another AT 184 (51.8%)
Using a different device 180 (50.7%)
Switching to a mobile app 161 (45.4%)
Doing business elsewhere 155 (43.7%)
Seeking guidance from others with BVI 140 (39.4%)
Utilizing services via phone 140 (39.4%)
Contacting the company 133 (37.5%)
Using a visual interpreting service 111 (31.3%)
Switching to screen reader mode 106 (29.9%)
Using my remaining vision 53 (14.9%)
App Strategies
Switching to web version instead of mobile app 197 (65%)
Upgrading the app 196 (64.7%)
Getting in-person help from a sighted person 186 (61.4%)
Updating my OS 139 (45.9%)
Seeking guidance from others with BVI 135 (44.6%)
Doing business elsewhere 125 (41.3%)
Contacting the company 85 (28.1%)
Utilizing services via phone 84 (27.7%)
Using different AT 75 (24.8%)
Using the mobile app on a different device 71 (23.4%)
Using a visual interpreting service 71 (23.4%)
Using my remaining vision 37 (12.2%)


Open-Ended Description of Barriers to Access


Participants were asked to describe the top three challenges they most frequently encounter during website usage. A large number of participants mentioned unlabeled items, especially buttons and links, as a barrier to access (n=298). Another 113 participants mentioned issues with screen reader navigation. Fifty-two participants described poor contrast in text or images. Other issues included enlarged fonts which made it difficult to access all the information on the screen, being unfamiliar with how to use websites (especially when they change or have confusing layouts), difficulty completing Captchas, voiceover being unable to read foreign languages, and being unable to zoom.

Participants were also asked to describe the top three barriers they encountered with mobile apps. Overall, responses were similar to those provided for website barriers. A large number of participants mentioned unlabeled or mislabeled elements, particularly buttons, as a barrier to access (n=129). Another 56 participants mentioned images or graphics that lacked text descriptions, and 42 participants mentioned difficulty interacting with controls, such as buttons or edit fields that did not respond appropriately when tapped. Other issues included difficulties with poor contrast or text being too small to read for those who have low vision; apps losing accessibility when updated; apps spontaneously refreshing or having focus jump around the screen; and apps with cluttered layouts that were difficult to navigate with AT.

Others described the methods they implemented to circumvent accessibility challenges, including seeking sighted assistance; avoiding inaccessible apps; enlarging screens with external magnifiers; and using laptops instead of mobile devices. Fifteen participants identified lost time and reduced productivity as additional negative impacts.