Assistive Technology Act of 2004, 29 U.S.C. § 3002(a)(4)
Bennett, C. L., Gleason, C., Scheuerman, M. K., Bigham, J. P., Guo, A., & To, A. (2021, May). “It’s complicated”: Negotiating accessibility and (mis) representation in image descriptions of race, gender, and disability. Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1-19).
Bianchi, F., Kalluri, P., Durmus, E., Ladhak, F., Cheng, M., Nozza, D., ... & Caliskan, A. (2023, June). Easily accessible text-to-image generation amplifies demographic stereotypes at large scale. Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (pp. 1493-1504).
Brown, L. X., Richardson, M., Shetty, R., Crawford, A., & Hoagland, T. (2020, October). Report: Challenging the use of algorithm-driven decision-making in benefits determinations affecting people with disabilities. Center For Democracy and Technology.
Center for Democracy and Technology. (2022, December). Civil Rights Standards for 21st Century Employment Selection Procedures. Center for Democracy and Technology.
Dalkey, N., & Helmer, O. (1963). An experimental application of the Delphi method to the use of experts. Management Science, 9(3), 458–467. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.9.3.458
Disability Rights Education & Defense Fund (DREDF). (2022, September). Disability Bias in Clinical Algorithms: Recommendations for Healthcare Organizations.
Edwards, E., & Machledt, D. (2023, May 15). Principles for Fairer, More Responsive Automated Decision-Making Systems. National Health Law Program. https://healthlaw.org/resource/principles-for-fairer-more-responsive-automated-decision-making-systems/
Exec. Order No. 13859, 3 C.F.R. 254 (2019). https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CFR-2020-title3-vol1/pdf/CFR-2020-title3-vol1-eo13859.pdf
Exec. Order No. 14110, 3 C.F.R. 658 (2023). https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CFR-2020-title3-vol1/pdf/CFR-2020-title3-vol1-eo13859.pdf
Falzarano, M., & Zipp, G.P. (2013). Seeking consensus through the use of the Delphi technique in health sciences research. Journal of Allied Health, 42(2), 99-105.
Franc, J. M., Hung, K. K. C., Pirisi, A., & Weinstein, E. S. (2023). Analysis of Delphi study 7-point linear scale data by parametric methods: use of the mean and standard deviation. Methodological Innovations, 16(2), 226-233.
Gadiraju, V., Kane, S., Dev, S., Taylor, A., Wang, D., Denton, E., & Brewer, R. (2023, June). " I wouldn’t say offensive but...": Disability-Centered Perspectives on Large Language Models. Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (pp. 205-216).
Gamage, B., Do, T. T., Price, N. S. C., Lowery, A., & Marriott, K. (2023, October). What do Blind and Low-Vision People Really Want from Assistive Smart Devices? Comparison of the Literature with a Focus Study. Proceedings of the 25th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (pp. 1-21).
Glazko, K., Mohammed, Y., Kosa, B., Potluri, V., & Mankoff, J. (2024, June). Identifying and Improving Disability Bias in GPT-Based Resume Screening. The 2024 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (pp. 687-700).
Hampshire, R. (2024, May 3). Opportunities and Challenges of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Transportation; Request for Information. Department of Transportation.
Kamikubo, R., Wang, L., Marte, C., Mahmood, A., & Kacorri, H. (2022, October). Data representativeness in accessibility datasets: A meta-analysis. Proceedings of the 24th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (pp. 1-15).
Lewicki, K., Lee, M. S. A., Cobbe, J., & Singh, J. (2023, April). Out of Context: Investigating the Bias and Fairness Concerns of “Artificial Intelligence as a Service”. Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1-17).
Morrison, C., Cutrell, E., Grayson, M., Becker, E. R., Kladouchou, V., Pring, L., ... & Sellen, A. (2021, October). Enabling meaningful use of AI-infused educational technologies for children with blindness: Learnings from the development and piloting of the PeopleLens curriculum. Proceedings of the 23rd International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (pp. 1-13).
Morrison, C., Grayson, M., Marques, R. F., Massiceti, D., Longden, C., Wen, L., & Cutrell, E. (2023, October). Understanding Personalized Accessibility through Teachable AI: Designing and Evaluating Find My Things for People who are Blind or Low Vision. Proceedings of the 25th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (pp. 1-12).
Moura, I. (2022, November 7). Addressing Disability & Ableist Bias in Autonomous Vehicles: Ensuring Safety, Equity & Accessibility in Detection, Collision Algorithms and Data Collection. Disability Rights Education & Defense Fund.
PEAT. (2023, April 24). AI in the Workplace. PEAT. https://www.peatworks.org/ai-disability-inclusion-toolkit/equitable-ai-in-the-workplace/ai-in-the-workplace/
PEAT. (2023b, December 7). Automated Surveillance Can Create Barriers for Workers with Disabilities. PEAT. https://www.peatworks.org/automated-surveillance-creates-barriers-for-workers-with-disabilities/
PEAT. (2024, September 26). AI & Inclusive Hiring Framework. PEAT. https://www.peatworks.org/ai-inclusive-hiring-framework/
Ray, R. (2023, September 11). AI and Transportation - The Eno Center for Transportation. The Eno Center For Transportation. https://enotrans.org/eno-resources/ai-and-transportation/
SAE International. (2021, April 30). J3016_202104: Taxonomy and definitions for terms related to driving automation systems for on-road motor vehicles. https://www.sae.org/standards/content/j3016_202104/
Shelby, R., Rismani, S., Henne, K., Moon, A., Rostamzadeh, N., Nicholas, P., ... & Virk, G. (2023, August). Sociotechnical harms of algorithmic systems: Scoping a taxonomy for harm reduction. Proceedings of the 2023 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society (pp. 723-741).
Stangl, A. J., Kothari, E., Jain, S. D., Yeh, T., Grauman, K., & Gurari, D. (2018, October). Browsewithme: An online clothes shopping assistant for people with visual impairments. Proceedings of the 20th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (pp. 107-118).
The National Artificial Intelligence Advisory Committee (NAIAC). (n.d.). Rationales, Mechanisms, and Challenges to Regulating AI: A Concise Guide and Explanation.
Theodorou, L., Massiceti, D., Zintgraf, L., Stumpf, S., Morrison, C., Cutrell, E., ... & Hofmann, K. (2021, October). Disability-first dataset creation: lessons from constructing a dataset for teachable object recognition with blind and low vision data collectors. Proceedings of the 23rd International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (pp. 1-12).
Treviranus, J. (2018, Oct 31). Sidewalk Toronto and why smarter is not better. Medium (blog). https://medium.datadriveninvestor.com/sidewalk-toronto-and-why-smarter-is-not-better-b233058d01c8
Tyson, C. (2024, February 15). DRAFT DREDF Fact Sheet on AI & Tech in Education. Disability Rights Education and Defense Fund.
U.S. Department of Justice Civil Rights Division. (2024, October 1). Artificial Intelligence and Civil Rights. https://www.justice.gov/crt/ai
Wiessner, D. (2024). EEOC says workday must face claims that AI software is biased | Reuters. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/legal/transactional/eeoc-says-workday-covered-by-anti-bias-laws-ai-discrimination-case-2024-04-11/
Woelfel, K., Aboulafia, A., Laird, E., & Brinker, S. (2023). Protecting Students' Civil Rights in the Digital Age. Center for Democracy & Technology.
